@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

bhmnscmm

@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

US prisoners are being assigned dangerous jobs. But what happens if they are hurt or killed? ( apnews.com )

Blas Sanchez was nearing the end of a 20-year stretch in an Arizona prison when he was leased out to work at Hickman’s Family Farms, which sells eggs that end up in the supply chains of huge companies like McDonald’s, Target and Albertsons. While assigned to a machine that churns chicken droppings into compost, his right leg...

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

Do you have any more information about illegal slavery until the 1980s? I'm not doubting it, I've just never heard that and would like to learn more.

bhmnscmm , (edited )
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

This headline is technically correct, but it's clearly meant to cause outrage. The headline "Trump's Bible only includes the bill of rights" isn't going to get as much attention.

Manufacturing outrage obfuscates Trump's actions that people should actually be outraged about.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

The headline specifically states those two amendments are omitted because it is the most likely to cause outrage, not because it is the most accurate description of the situation. It's not incorrect. It's misleading.

My county courthouse has a mural of the original constitution and the bill of rights: are they making a political statement by omitting all the other amendments?

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

Not sure if this is exactly what you're looking for, but the opening scene to The Conversation uses a high-zoom shot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlwdpNw1FW8

Eye in the Sky also prominently features long-distance/high magnification shots from the perspective of a drone/UAV.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

If Hamas isn't a terrorist organization then what would you call them?

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

My definition of terrorist tactics is irrelevant to how the OP would classify Hamas.

Regardless, here's how terrorism is defined on Wikipedia: it seems pretty reasonable to me.

Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims. The term is used in this regard primarily to refer to intentional violence during peacetime or in the context of war against non-combatants

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

The fact that you're trying move this conversation towards the actions of Israel while avoiding the actions of Hamas leads me to believe you're not interested in having a genuine discussion. I think you're trying to play gotcha.

Have Israel and Hamas used terrorist tactics? I think so. Do both sides not care about the well-being of civilians? I think so. Are both sides of this conflict bad? I think so.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

I agree with everything you've said. Hamas can be a terrorist organization, and still be the elected government. Both can be true, and acknowledging the how and why of that being the case is necessary reach a resolution to the conflict.

Study reveals "widespread, bipartisan aversion" to neighbors owning AR-15 rifles ( www.psypost.org )

A recent study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences reveals that across all political and social groups in the United States, there is a strong preference against living near AR-15 rifle owners and neighbors who store guns outside of locked safes. This surprising consensus suggests that when it...

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

Probably because the vast majority people are capable of using a subwoofer responsibly.

Subwoofer ownership isn't an explicitly stated constitutional right, so it can't be for that reason.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

The hip fire point really got me. Hip firing a gun makes it far less deadly. You have to actually aim to hit targets. Real life isn't like video games.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

Fair enough for a general survey question. However, the point about how policy decisions shouldn't be based on opinion/anecdote is still valid (at least in the case of gun control).

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

AR-10s have been gaining popularity for deer hunting in my area recently.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

I could understand the argument for factoring people's feelings into policy in some cases, but let's take this study as an example.

Handguns are responsible for far more harm than AR-15s, but this study shows people "fear" AR-15s more. A policy that is based on these findings and not empirical data may attempt to reduce gun violence by addressing AR-15 ownership. Thereby not having a major effect on reducing actual gun violence.

A policy focusing on reducing handgun ownership would be much more effective at reducing gun violence, despite people not fearing them as much.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

I think you're confusing me with other commentors. I haven't suggested this research in particular is being actively used to support policy decisions. Nor have I suggested this research is advocating for policy.

In my initial comment I simply said policy in general (at least with gun control) shouldn't be based on people's feelings/anecdotes.

I think this study asked a very interesting question, and I find the results to be very interesting. I don't really have any issues with this research by itself.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

Assuming you're in the US, that's either a really cheap mortgage or a huge family. Where are you seeing grocery expenses exceed mortgage payments?

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

So you spend $400/month on restaurants?

$150 x 4 = $600/month.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

I don't get the point you're trying to make with your graph. Obviously there wouldn't be many Zoomers working full time; most are still in school.

Zoomers born after 2006 haven't graduated high-school, and those born between 2002-2006 are in college. That's leaves only a 5 year window of people you'd expect to be employed full time.

The line for millenials looks about the same as Zoomers.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

I'm trying to understand your argument against the article and what point you're trying to make by using their chart.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

I can't read the entire article since it's behind a pay wall for me, but graph alone doesn't support or contradict the headline. It simply shows the full time employment of Zoomers is comparable millenials at when they were the same age. It doesn't show anything about income.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

People are taking this way too literally. It's just a goofy meme that's expressing a general sentiment.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

Shit stirring on the internet? Preposterous!

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

And if you're a fan of quotation marks you could call it a "2"x4"."

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

It's always immigrant kids. Nobody should be surprised that the companies that are willing to illegally employ immigrants are also willing to violate other labor laws.

Allow these people (the adults, not kids) to become legally employed and this problem will be drastically reduced.

Is there a name for this sort of object? I need something like this, but don't know what to type into the webs ( lemmy.world )

I'm going to convert my computer chair from pneumatic to static. I'm currently using plastic clasps that are held on with jubilee clips, but they're not great and need replaced (I'm a heavy lad). A sturdy metal version would be better....

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

This sounds like it would accomplish what you need. Look up two piece shaft collar, or shaft coupler.

https://www.mcmaster.com/search?q=hinged%20shaft%20collars

Use McMaster to find what you need. You should be able to find a cheaper supplier using McMaster's terminology.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

But don't they always say sharp knives are more safe than dull knives?

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

All the practical to automate physical/blue collar jobs have already been automated. Anyone who's job doesn't require interacting with the physical world is who's at risk for automation/AI nowadays.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

The US tried that. It was called the Articles of Confederation. It didn't really work out.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

I would image it's because the original trial was declared invalid (mis-trial). Not because he was found not guilty. Essentially no verdict has been reached, therefore double jeopardy isn't applicable.

bhmnscmm ,
@bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

No kidding. There's no need to be so judgemental of that woman over such a short quote. People react to all sorts of events this way. Tornados, fires, kidnappings, etc.

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the moderator]

  • Loading...
  • bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    The beatings will continue until cooperation improves.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    What do you consider to be memes? Just images/image macros? Gifs? Videos? Copy pastas? Do you dislike all of these, or just some?

    Generically, I'd say memes are essentially just widespread "internet culture" inside jokes. Disliking humor or inside jokes is definitely not the norm.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    Not saying her actions are right, but I live in a rural area and people personally shooting their own dogs and other animals that are deemed a danger is pretty common. People often do it when the animals need to be euthanized for health reasons too.

    I personally know lots of people who do this. I have plenty of family members who have done it.

    Again, I don't think her actions were appropriate. I just want to point out how commonplace shooting ones own animals is (in some places) since a lot of people here seem totally unaware.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    Just to reiterate, I'm not saying it's right. There are absolutely better ways of addressing these issues.

    But I don't know what to tell you--I don't live far from SD and I have personally spoken to multiple people (face to face) that have done exactly what Kristi Noem described.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    I'm not justifying it. I don't think it's justifiable. I just wanted to bring up how common this behavior is in some rural areas.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    I'm in complete agreement with you.

    I just wanted to bring up a big cultural difference I've seen in my area that people seem to be unaware of.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    A war between Russia and NATO would result in the textbook definition of a pyrhhic victory. Everyone should be afraid of that. There will be no winners in nuclear combat.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    They're a weapon of last resort because of (warranted) fear of them. Hence, everyone absolutely should be scared of war between NATO and Russia.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    Great quote! That's one of my absolute favorite books. I recommend it to people all the time.

    If you liked Alas, Babylon, I'd strongly recommend On The Beach by Nevil Shute.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    Not to mention the fact that all it takes is for one nuclear exchange to happen, and the world as we know it ceases to exist. The stakes are incredibly high.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    The Nicaraguans “have no reason to inject themselves into a conflict over the Middle East,” one of the western intelligence officers said.

    Well that's definitely the most ironic thing I'm going to read for a while.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    So because Western nations are larger they've been entitled to interfere in the Middle East for the last century?

    And how much trade needs to occur between two countries to entitle one to interfere with the other?

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    The West shoe-horned themselves into the Middle East decades ago. The West currently has a "vested" interest because they've made an absolute mess of the Middle East, when there was never a good reason for getting involved in the first place. Historically, the West has done in the exactly what they're now accusing Nicaragua of.

    Additionally, it's particularly ironic due to America's historical meddling in Nicaragua.

    I'm making no comment on Nicaragua making this move in good faith. I agree it's obvious that they're a pawn. I'm only pointing out the hypocrisy.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    I've simply pointed out the irony and hipocrisy. I'm making no statement on whether or not Nicaragua should be involved.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    Don't you understand, if we make the symbols illegal then people won't have those beliefs anymore. Duh.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    You've perfectly described the problem with what the OP is proposing. Disagreeing with that position doesn't make you a Nazi.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    Accusing a stranger of being a Nazi when faced with reasonable disagreement; the mark of true enlightenment.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    I interpreted the "you" in the reply to my comment as referring to me specifically.

    If it was meant as a general "you", then I take it back. I'm not trying build a strawman. I'm just trying to disagree with the notion that every country should have laws like Germany and Austria.

    bhmnscmm ,
    @bhmnscmm@lemmy.world avatar

    First off, waiting in line at TSA while some people get to skip should be pretty far down the list of problems to fix for any reasonable person. It's unfair, but it doesn't hurt anyone. There are finite resources available to fix problems, so why not fix the problems that actually hurt people every day.

    Second off, even if you decide TSA wait times are a high priority problem, this proposal does nothing to fix it. Again, why not spend these resources on reducing wait time for everyone?

    All this does is draw attention to people spending their way around an inconvenience, without actually fixing the inconvenience to for ordinary people. It's generating outrage without fixing the problem.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • news
  • movies
  • leopardsatemyface
  • stillalive
  • ServerNonsense
  • istillthinkofyou
  • oneorangebraincell
  • MBBS
  • All magazines