@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

Signtist

@Signtist@lemm.ee

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

Honestly, I like the fact that I could hold and eat this while doing other things at a BBQ. It would also be useful if there's not a lot of seating for everyone.

I am a sucker for turning normally-sweet treats into savory ones, though - I turned my cinnamon rolls recipe into a cheesy rolls recipe a few years ago, and I consider it one of the best ideas I've ever had, so maybe it's just me.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

Looks like a savory parfait to me.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

Well, lets see, I make my company about 3 orders of magnitude more money than they pay me every year, so I suppose if my kids gather 1000 pieces of candy, I'll give one back to them as payment.

What reading style do you consider more tedious to read, A) short, concise, and precise, but using non-layperson vocabulary, B) using layperson vocabulary, but it's longer, drawn out, and not precise?

I've seen a lot of people on here be teased for difficulty expressing themselves. Either people complain "you're using big person words to describe mundane things" when they're aiming for precision or "woah, we don't need that damn wall of text" when they're aiming for clarity. It's like people just want to complain.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

I'm definitely in support of A, regardless. I only know complex words from having seen them used correctly in the wild; how could anyone be expected to learn them otherwise?

The ability to find an approximate definition of a new word using context - and slowly whittle it down to the actual definition over subsequent encounters - is invaluable for gaining better language comprehension.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

Pretty sure they mean one less account someone could track you with, because yeah, staying on top of sending monthly checks for stuff is something I'm very glad I don't have to do anymore. My credit took multiple hits in my younger days from bills I forgot to pay on time.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

Nah, they just did a bunch of takes for the music video.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

They've never needed pictures before, and they don't need pictures now. Hell, even the iconic meme picture is taken from a video of a woman speaking normally - they just used an unflattering frame to discredit her. This isn't a ploy to get a photo op of the left being mad, it's another small push of the republican boundaries. Enough "joke" bills about overbearing punishments for minor offenses made by people their party doesn't like, and they'll be primed enough to fully support the real thing. We're already there for a large portion of the republican base.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

Turns out all those people who put an orange filter over scenes in Mexico were just trying to show a happy, friendly atmosphere!

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

As much as I personally disagree with you, given that all you're thinking about is your own benefit, and not any of the myriad of benefits to the city, the world, the people who can't afford cars, etc, I understand that your outlook is shared by the vast majority of Americans, and can't be ignored if we ever hope to have an effective public transport system.

We're going to need to somehow devise a system so convenient that it actually sounds attractive to the huge amount of people who spend 10%+ of their paycheck on car payments not because they have to, but because they want to.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

Hmm... Man seemingly dies, goes into a small space with hard walls, comes back a little while later with the ability to fly... Is Jesus mothman?

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

Yeah, people who have experienced it understand that you don't "try" gaslighting. People who do it are just constantly doing it, usually without even needing to try - it's just their natural state to counter the things other people say. It works not by making someone believe a lie, but by wearing them down slowly, showing such confidence in something that the victim sees as being so clearly incorrect that they can't help but think that maybe they're the problem.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

Tell everyone else not to try the lasagna?

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

I think the biggest issue is that we don't know what to do when we're mad anymore. People think that being mad is all you need - that if you say you're mad, things will change. I often see people get pissed about something, then calm down and move on, as if they somehow achieved something with their anger alone.

I'm hoping that there's some pressure going on under the surface, and people will eventually reach a point where enough anger has built up that they can't take it anymore and they really take action, but from what I've seen, people are so against the concept of acting upon angry feelings that I worry they'll just hold it in until they die.

Whistleblower Josh Dean of Boeing supplier Spirit AeroSystems has died ( www.seattletimes.com )

Joshua Dean, a former quality auditor at Boeing supplier Spirit AeroSystems and one of the first whistleblowers to allege Spirit leadership had ignored manufacturing defects on the 737 MAX, died Tuesday morning after a struggle with a sudden, fast-spreading infection. ...

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

I haven't heard anyone irl talking about Boeing recently, and barely even saw anything online a week after the initial death. While it pisses me off to no end, this incident will blow over just as easily for Boeing.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

Yeah, if anything, I expect people to book whatever flights they were already going to book, and just crack jokes like "I hope I make it!"

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

Nobody needs a friend so badly that they're justified in making friends with a genocidal maniac. I understand that Israel has been a long-term investment, but the amount of human suffering going on right now vastly outweighs any lamentations about sunk cost. What this country needs is a president willing to show that he cares about preventing suffering above all else. Doctors take an oath to both do good and do no harm - it's time for our presidents to do the same, and be held to it to the same degree.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

If only it were as exciting as the shitty startups that sell for millions a few years after being founded despite never making any profit...

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

Elon threw money at the problem and it worked, as it so often does. Conversely, the tactic failed in the Twitter scenario. That's his entire game plan for everything, a trait he shares with nearly every other person born with a silver spoon in their mouth.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

Whenever I hear the name Ariana Grande, I can't help but try to translate it to "Big Aryan." I know that's not a correct translation, but it's always what I picture in my head.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

It fits pretty well for people who are really bad at sex. I mean... maybe it does... who knows? Definitely not me.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

It's been a while since I learned about cations and anions, but I still remember their charges by thinking of anions as onions that need a single sharp blade to cut, making a "-" sign, while cations have 2 front paws of sharp claws that make a "+" sign. It's a dumb way of remembering that I came up with on the spot when I first learned about them, but I still remember after more than a decade.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

I hope this goes as well as it's being marketed to be, but I've long since stopped trusting people who have enough money to make a news-worthy purchase. Time will tell on this one for me.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

I'm all for kicking both jammed doors and walls.

Signtist ,
@Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

You know the sound right when it starts to rain?

There's a tap on the roof or the window, then a few more, and you think "Oh, is that...?" and, sure enough, the taps continue, getting more and more frequent until they blend together into the soothing patter of rainfall. Now imagine that, but instead of light taps, it's a dull "phomp."

I imagine someone in an alternate universe hearing that first phomp, and running to grab a cup of tea before sitting by the window to watch the manfall.

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    Most republican voters I know, boomer or otherwise, simply view voting differently than most their lefter-leaning constituents. I often hear them say that the point of voting is to simply choose what benefits you the most, and that if everyone simply chooses things that specifically align with their own wants and needs, that the biggest, most important groups will get what is needed. It's not even that they understand that they're being selfish by only voting in their own best interests, they just honestly believe that considering the needs of others when voting undermines its effectiveness.

    Now, it's obvious that they're wrong - smaller groups deserve just as much of a say as their larger counterparts, and the country benefits when they do - but they don't think about it that way. I believe it's also why republicans are so concerned about becoming a minority - they honestly believe that voting should specifically only benefit the largest group, and are desperately trying to maintain "their people" as the largest group.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    Yeah, exactly. Many republican voters think that everyone should vote for their own goals, and that the biggest group should win, so they're terrified of not being the biggest group in any given demographic (religion, race, etc.). What they fail to realize is that most people vote for how they'd like the country itself to be run, which includes smaller groups just as much as larger ones, so losing that majority footing wouldn't impact them very much if at all.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    No, I don't, "the population" does. I have control over myself, 1 teeny tiny sliver of the group that is "the population." If there's one thing "the population" is known to put the effort into doing, it's twiddling their thumbs. It's nothing more than a huge writhing mass of opinions. To expect it to coordinate effectively enough to make change happen is just as ridiculous as to expect all the molecules in a glass of water to suddenly converge on one side. "The population" doesn't make change, it buffers against it.

    "Oh, all we have to do is get 8 billion people of different backgrounds, opinions, socioeconomic standards, and every other metric to agree on something. Surely that's a feasible task!"

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    We got rid of lead products because governments put out new regulations that prevented companies from making products with lead, not because the population collectively decided not to buy products with lead in them. If companies had been allowed to continue making lead products, they'd have done so, and people would have continued buying them despite the science pointing to them being bad for you.

    Companies will do whatever is profitable unless prevented from doing so by regulations, and people will buy what companies sell because most people don't know, and don't have the time to figure out what products they buy are harmful to themselves and others. Even when they do, they often don't have the wealth to make a change to buying safer, more expensive products.

    "How society works" is that people have to buy products to survive, and often have little choice among what products they can afford. If we want companies to start lowering their emissions, we need to force them to do so with regulations, just like we had to do with lead.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    Except when you get more and more people in the group, the wants of any given individual get outweighed for larger, more generalized expenses. This is literally the same concept as taxes, just applied to a small enough group that an individual gets a real say in how the money is spent.

    But if it works well it'll inevitably get popular, attract more users, and the voice of the many will drown out the voice of the few, with out-of-touch treasurers spending the money unwisely, becoming exactly the same in every way as taxes.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    Hard to work the guillotine when everyone's suffering from great stroke.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    As soon as I saw this I thought "Get this man some iodine, stat! Or, conversely, stop giving this man so much iodine!"

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    It's important to define was "equal" is in this context. Some people hear "equal" and think they must measure exactly the same in every test, but that's not how the word is being used in this context. It's more that people are so varied from one person to another that no test can truly judge them well enough to differentiate them when it comes to inherent worth.

    One person might measure above another in one test, but there are surely many others where the results would be flipped. There are so many different things you could test a person on that in the end none of them really matter; any one measurement is like trying to figure out what an extinct animal looked like from a single tiny piece of a fossil.

    That's what the IQ test is doing - it's taking one tiny piece of human intelligence, which itself is one tiny piece of what might be said to make up a person's value, and trying to use that to extrapolate information about them that simply can't be taken from such a 1-dimensional test. It's not worthless, but it needs to be paired with a bunch of other tests before it can really say anything, and even then it wouldn't say much.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    This is a great point. The results of an IQ test aren't really measuring a person, they're measuring a byproduct of that person, which is significantly less informative.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    The original story was written to convince children to settle for the life they have, rather than risk their livelihood searching for something different. The Disney version was modified to fit a more stereotypical "American Dream" lesson that believes making your own life can be rewarding.

    The same story, but with differing endings for differing lessons following the differing mindsets of differing places at differing times. It's fun to think about how much a children's story can be changed to reflect the lesson its teller means to teach.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    Hmm, I'm not sure I agree with that.

    By teaching kids that pushing against the "natural order" of the world gets you killed, and that you should just stay in your preassigned life designation, you're not hardening them, you're teaching them that rising up and fighting back is useless, and will only get you killed. The original story was meant to keep kids in line, and I think we've got enough propaganda keeping people in line at the moment.

    Maybe the Disney version only made the ending nicer to be more palatable to a modern audience, but the lesson that a better life can be attained by persevering through challenges is a sentiment that I can definitely support instilling in the younger generation.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    The issue with allowing it to simply crumble away is that the last people to die will be the ones exploiting the system, as they have the resources and the power to stay alive the longest. If you want the people who would rebuild society into one that is better than what we already have to still be around when all is said and done, we need to tear it down ourselves.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    Looks like a mall I'd frequent a lot in Grand Forks, ND in college. It always looked run down, but it had really nice little shops in it. Basically a haven for local small businesses that couldn't afford their own building.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    You're right, it's not... Too bad most places have realized they can just raise prices together and share in the extra profits, rather than compete with one another. There's a reason why price fixing is illegal, and there's a reason why the government rarely enforces it.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    Sweet! I sure hope the inflation wouldn't completely invalidate the extra income, but I still have very little faith in American capitalism allowing for there to be money not immediately being funneled into the bank accounts of the 1%.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    If I was buying Ritz crackers for $4 before, maybe now they're $5. I'm making more money, and it's just $1, so I might not even be paying enough attention to notice, but if everything goes up by a similar amount, then I'm spending significantly more on the same items than I was before, and might end up dropping $100 of my new UBI money on groceries without even making a change in my shopping habits.

    Now, a lower income person might be buying store brand crackers that only cost $2, but now they're $3, so the same situation occurs.

    These are hypothetical numbers of course, but I wouldn't be surprised if a situation like that occurred, given that every company would know exactly how much more money is now in everyone's pockets. Every product goes up just a bit, just to take a bit of that UBI pie.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    I certainly hope you're right. All I picture is the dollar stores suddenly becoming $2 stores as everything just shifts to be more expensive with very few people improving their financial situation at all.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    Doesn't that just further validate my concerns? Prices are going up to gouge people even when a lot of people don't have the cash to pay for it. I see no reason why a landlord charging $15,000 a year won't just up it to $25,000 a year when everyone gets a $10k UBI. The government seems to care very little about preventing things like that.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    I understand that there are solutions that could fix this, I just don't think the US government as it is now would be willing to enact or enforce them even if it went ahead with UBI. That's why my initial post said we need to figure out these things before UBI, or else we'll enact it without things like taxes for vacant units or rent control between renters, and it'll fail, killing any enthusiasm for another attempt following potential law changes to fix the issues.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    Essentially. They can't freely change rent for current tenants since they need to stay within the confines of whatever lease was agreed upon, but they can make rent whatever they want for new tenants, so it's not an uncommon occurrence for them to simply stop fixing things in a timely manner so that current tenants feel compelled to leave, and then they can fill the space, charging whatever they feel someone will pay for rent after that. It's scummy, and it's technically illegal, but everyone knows they won't really get in trouble for it.

    Signtist ,
    @Signtist@lemm.ee avatar

    Well, once the lease is over people have to sign a new one anyway, so even existing tenants can only lock in rates for so long. And when one landlord ups rent, it's usually because all the other landlords are doing it too - it seems like they do it in unison, I imagine because they don't want to have to worry about people leaving for somewhere cheaper. I'm not sure if it's illegal like price fixing or not, but it doesn't seem to make a difference in the end.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • news
  • movies
  • leopardsatemyface
  • stillalive
  • ServerNonsense
  • istillthinkofyou
  • oneorangebraincell
  • MBBS
  • All magazines