@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

01189998819991197253

@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub

Unless explicitly stated, all content posted by this user, is done so under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

You don't need a DNA test. I know what he is. He's your dude. That's all that matters.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

One of the worst movies I have ever seen. Would totally watch again.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

And they're friggin escape artists. If you thought huskies are good at escaping, you've never met a malinois. On the plus side, they're one of the most loyal dogs you'll ever meet.

Edit. Actually, now that I'm thinking about it, malinois just take everything to the extreme. When they get excited, you've never seen a dog more excited. When they get protective, they're the most. And so on.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

I don't know. He's wearing a shirt. Dogs don't wear shirts. Maybe a dog, but it's unclear.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

That's a really good point.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT) Act of 2001

Not everything needs to be an acronym.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Here's a tool to permanently fix your windows installation from all this BS.

ᶠᵘˡˡ ᵈᶦˢᶜˡᵒˢᵘʳᵉ ⁻ ᶦᵗ‘ˢ ᵃⁿ ᶦⁿˢᵗᵃˡˡᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿ ᵍᵘᶦᵈᵉ ᵗᵒ ᴸᶦⁿᵘˣ ᴹᶦⁿᵗ

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

I remember the day when you had to buy Windows separate, and pay full retail. Later, you got a massive discount if you bought the disks with your computer. Then, it came preinstalled. Then, it started to get crappy and more buggy.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

cd c:\oregontr

start .com

Good times. Good times....

(Edit. Added space in command, so it's not a website)

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Isn't it already illegal to cover your face from above the nose downward in NC? I went there on a business trip a couple years before COVID, and wore a respirator while outside. A cop stopped me and told me that it's against statute to cover my face in public places. I explained to him that I'm not from there and pollen in that state, at least in Charlotte, was horrific. He was understanding, but highly recommend I find another way. I thanked him and we parted ways. I was leaving the next day, so I didn't find another way.

This article makes it sound that they're not going to make it illegal, since it already is, but are, instead, going to make it a higher crime if you commit one while wearing a mask. What I'm gathering, is basically "wear one if you want. But if you commit a misdemeanor while wearing one, it'll be a felony" (or however the scales increase). Did I misunderstand?

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

That's fair. I also haven't been back, but not because of him haha

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

I'm fairly certain that the source for this is bank robbers of yore. But this goes under "we do this, because we've always done it that way", and it's the absolute worst reason to keep doing something. I, for one, enjoyed and supported my right to wear masks for the sole reason that it hid a good part of my face. Didn't do much for facial recog, as we saw, but humans have a hard time identifying and remembering faces without seeing a mouth. I knew the masks weren't real respirators and weren't nearly as effective as they could have been (the reason I wore an actual respirator pre COVID and during), but I very much enjoyed the added privacy for everyone nonetheless.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

1: the reason I supported them before COVID, during, and now, and the reason I support their legalization.

But...

2: COVID has trained facial recog algorithms to identify masked faces. Those algorithms still have a hard time with identify altering makeup, but don't seem to have any issues with masks. True privacy no longer exists. Freedom to protest in most countries is restricted to public spaces. When you privatize everything (including education), public spaces diminish, and your right to protest with it.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

In NC? I know some places have had this law (maybe it was town-specific) since western times.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

So... basically, RDP through thunderbolt? Or did I skim too fast?

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

They're not "grave robbers". They're "archeologists".

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Install a second language keyboard, and put your password in those characters.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

To add: how I have "2 unread messages", but nothing when filtered for unread. My phone will forever have 2 unread messages.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Not sure how long it's been since your last org, but a lot has changed in the Teams universe as of late (and mostly not for the better).

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

But then Microsoft can't say that people are opting to move from Teams to New Teams, and show how amazing the people think New Teams is. I don't know if that's why they're doing it that way, but it feels like that.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Nintendo on their way to file a DMCA C&D letter.

https://infosec.pub/pictrs/image/472164ef-bc04-4ebb-a3be-6f44b962bd04.jpeg

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

It did say "subjective negative reviews". I would take that to mean that strictly objective negative reviews are perfectly acceptable.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

This is worse than some of the resumés I've seen, with "proficient with Google search" [or "google" as a soft skill].

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Haha! Oh, man!

It's definitely a skill, but not one I would expect to see on a resumé. I do mention it in interviews, that I don't know everything, but I can find out. Then they ask how, and I say that I know how to use search engines. But I akin it to "keyboarding". It is a skill, but it's something you're expected to know by now and shouldn't be added to a resumé.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

That name would be a major pain Payne

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

It sure will! Before they thought they wouldn't get in trouble. Now they know they wouldn't.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Came to say this same thing.

Also, ticks have 8 legs, not 6 as is shown in the picture (but that's just nitpicking).

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

We need a lifesize cutout of Carlos. Carlos for scale is the new banana for scale.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Submitted and approved in 2017.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

So, banana for scale becomes Banana for scale hahahaha

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Here ya go.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Thanks for this. Quite gruesome, but not at all unexpected. I remember having a conversation with a friend of mine a while back, where I made the argument that water expands when frozen and, since humans are mostly water, freezing a human would crack every vital organ. I'm actually upset to discover I was right.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

That actually doesn't sound much better to me, but my understanding of vitrification is minimal, at best. Still cool, though.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

This sounds pretty amazing. Do you have any sources (or process names that I can search)? I would love to read more into the LLM part of your statement. Seriously sounds like scifi, and I'm loving it.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

I'm familiar with some of those, but they don't digitally map thought and then read that map. At least not the last time I looked into them... Do they now?

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Very interesting! Maybe once we understand the structure, we can recreate what's behind the structure. Not sure if that's a good thing, but it certainly is intriguing.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

But wouldn't understanding the structure assist is rebuilding a mechanical version and, thus, recreating the consciousness into an artificial mechanism (such as a Terminator-esque android)?

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

That's fair. I do make a distinction between understanding how something works and why something works. Making it work the way you describe, to me at least, is understanding enough of how it works to be able to reproduce it, even if we don't yet understand why it works. Until we understand this science, it's magic.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

The point is to elicit positive emotions and associate them with a brand.

Then don't interrupt my movie or my pause time, and I won't be pissed at you, then have a seemingly irrational anger-hate when I see you at the store, and refuse to purchase you. There are so many products I won't buy because of this.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

ᵃⁿᵈ ᶦⁿ ʳᵃʳᵉ ᶜᵃˢᵉˢ ᵈᵉᵃᵗʰ ask your doctor how hydrofluorizine can help change your life

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Has vibes of the omnidirectional treadmill from Ready Player One. Sweet.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Yeah. Maybe I just bought the super cheap ones? Not sure. I ended up getting a 3.5 to 6.35 cable, and haven't had a problem since.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Ah. Yes. I see your original meaning. I misunderstood what you had meant.

Balanced will reduce noise (in terms of RF noise, of course) significantly better than unbalanced, but the source of noise does need to be far enough away from the capturing device to not affect it directly and, therefore, be able to be negated by the balanced cable. However, the end user (listening to balanced vs unbalanced signal on a mobile phone) won't be experiencing a difference between the two (IE placebo affect).

Thanks for clarifying!

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

shelf of cursed items

I love this idea, and am going to start doing this hahahha!

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Hahaha!! And I thought I was being excessive haha!

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

I was going off the few pages I read, including the one I linked. I'm far from an expert in this realm, so, really, I don't have any substantial argument for or against what either of us are saying. However, filmography, and the related foley artistry, has always intrigued, and I have learned from experience the differences between using a standard jack and an XLR, and I can say that the sound is vastly cleaner with XLR (at least on a set). The secondary jack on this phone seems to be to XLR what USB-microB is to USB-A (again, going off what I've read). You do make a lot of sense, though, in your posts, so I may be flat wrong here haha

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

Hahaha!! Like a random red door on the back wall of the basement. "That's just 'the door'. Nothing to worry about, as long as you keep your distance" and quickly walk them off with no further explanation. Hahahahaha

That makes sense. I used to get the adapters from a local shop where I used to live, and they were cheap cheap. Converted to USD, they were probably around $0.10 a piece. He gave them out free when you purchased headphone. After a while I got tired of the static and low sound quality, so I just got a cable (3.5-6.35) on ebay, and it's been fine since.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

That's already a thing. It goes without saying, but you have to build from source.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • news
  • movies
  • leopardsatemyface
  • stillalive
  • ServerNonsense
  • istillthinkofyou
  • oneorangebraincell
  • MBBS
  • All magazines
    •